Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Citizenship Trial Date Set For Next Year
Randy's Right ^

Posted on 10/01/2009 9:14:41 PM PDT by YoungGunConservativeRadio

Federal Judge David Carter has set a date of January 26, 2010 for a lawsuit questioning Barack Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States based on his “natural born” status.

Judge Carter dismissed Obama attorney team requests for a dismissal of the case, cutting them off several times and saying that “this is a very serious case” which must be resolved quickly for the sake of American troops stationed overseas in the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Witnesses report that Obama’s two attorneys left the 90-minute hearing looking “defeated and nervous.”

Judge Carter ordered early discovery for the trial back on Sept. 15th. The issue of early discovery means Obama’s lawyers must produce documents, including his hospital records, birth certificate, name of doctor, and all of the signatures, proving his natural born status within 30 days.

Should the case actually go to arguments before Judge Carter, it will be the first time the merits of the case will be heard in an open court.


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; orlytaitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Ronin

A tentative schedule. The 5th October will be a big day that very well decides it.


21 posted on 10/01/2009 9:51:06 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
I think you are right, but this case should really be heard.

I think you are absolutely right. Standing should be automatic in every single American citizen. The court decisions to date have been ridiculous. There is a serious effort to hide something and it seems that just about everyone is in on it.

22 posted on 10/01/2009 9:51:17 PM PDT by Defiant (Hey socialists-- We're right, we fight, get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: YoungGunConservativeRadio

This is OLD news, it looks like to me. There was no recent hearing that I know of. The hearing on the Defense motions to dismiss is set for Monday. Any decision to dismiss the motions would come after the hearing.

The reference to the “90 minutes”, and to the DOJ attorneys looking “nervous” relates to the hearing held in early September.


23 posted on 10/01/2009 9:55:39 PM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YoungGunConservativeRadio

The next thing to watch for here is whether or not Obama snubs Carter on the discovery phase like they did before.

I think they will refuse to produce documents, and challenge whatever ruling the Judge makes in response, take it out of his hands, and snuff it out in a higher court.

Surely, Judge Carter is smart enough to know based on his suspicions that this will be their tactic, and hopefully, he will be able to come up with a legal remedy within his power to make their defiance very costly.


24 posted on 10/01/2009 9:59:50 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southern Partisan
Which Judge Carter?

I think it is this case:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19633550/03118745409

25 posted on 10/01/2009 10:02:39 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
This was posted on WND September 8.

WND

26 posted on 10/01/2009 10:05:17 PM PDT by 22cal (Forgiven, not perfected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Red, I had Mikey Medv yesterday in the car and he, out of the blue, started in with denouncing Birthers. It was as usual gratuitous, unsolicited, but this time with uncharacteristically virulence and a frantic tone. I like MM and really cant figure who has got his short hair on this issue, but who ever it is, is tugging hard about now. The timing was curious to me yesterday, not so much so today.

Rab


27 posted on 10/01/2009 10:18:27 PM PDT by Rabin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: YoungGunConservativeRadio

obumpa


28 posted on 10/01/2009 11:37:08 PM PDT by Dajjal (Obama is an Ericksonian NLP hypnotist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YoungGunConservativeRadio
Judge Carter ordered early discovery for the trial back on Sept. 15th. The issue of early discovery means Obama’s lawyers must produce documents, including his hospital records, birth certificate, name of doctor, and all of the signatures, proving his natural born status within 30 days.

Not quite.

Discovery. The Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ Ex Parte Application for Limited Stay of Discovery

We'll find out Monday, won't we?

29 posted on 10/01/2009 11:53:23 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YoungGunConservativeRadio

“Witnesses report that Obama’s two attorneys left the 90-minute hearing looking “defeated and nervous.”

Kind of a delicious image.


30 posted on 10/02/2009 7:37:26 AM PDT by EggsAckley (There's an Ethiopian in the fuel supply. W.C. Fields)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YoungGunConservativeRadio

Isn’t there a hearing Monday on the DOJ dimmissal motion?

If the DOJ motion is granted would it not be the case that there will be no trial unless that decision is overtuned?


31 posted on 10/02/2009 7:48:37 AM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YoungGunConservativeRadio

Here’s a link to Orly’s October 1st “Plaintiffs’ Sur-Reply: the Ninth Amendment, etc.” entered in the case being heard October 5th in Judge David O. Carter’s court.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/20510457/DOC-78-KEYESvOBAMA-Plaintiff-SurReply-With-Exhibits-14

Let’s hope and pray that the government does not achieve a “dismissal” ruling on this critically important case!


32 posted on 10/02/2009 8:03:00 AM PDT by WhizCodger (Katie - Text my reply of "F U" to the NWO challengers, then bar the door!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YoungGunConservativeRadio

I thought this hearing was not until October 5th?
Also I notice, as of a few days ago, search engines are attacking Orly’s site again. Everytime you try to go on it they block it as an “attack site”.


33 posted on 10/02/2009 8:30:22 AM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanVictory
If the DOJ motion is granted would it not be the case that there will be no trial unless that decision is overtuned?

Yes, that would be the case.

34 posted on 10/02/2009 8:31:59 AM PDT by browardchad ("Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own fact" - Daniel P Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: YoungGunConservativeRadio
Judge Carter dismissed Obama attorney team requests for a dismissal of the case, cutting them off several times and saying that “this is a very serious case” which must be resolved quickly for the sake of American troops stationed overseas in the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan.

The hearing on the motion to dismiss isn't scheduled until Monday. You're fantasy world must be stuck in overdrive.

35 posted on 10/02/2009 8:34:20 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: browardchad

In tht regard teh web site and fundraising efforts of
Gary Kreep and his U. S. Justice Foundation seem more honest nd above board than seems to be the case with Dr. Taitz and her foundation is the impression that I am getting. What do you think? I am also puzzled that more attention is not paid to the Hollister appeal.


36 posted on 10/02/2009 8:49:11 AM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: browardchad

In tht regard teh web site and fundraising efforts of
Gary Kreep and his U. S. Justice Foundation seem more honest nd above board than seems to be the case with Dr. Taitz and her foundation is the impression that I am getting. What do you think? I am also puzzled that more attention is not paid to the Hollister appeal.


37 posted on 10/02/2009 8:49:23 AM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: browardchad

In tht regard teh web site and fundraising efforts of
Gary Kreep and his U. S. Justice Foundation seem more honest nd above board than seems to be the case with Dr. Taitz and her foundation is the impression that I am getting. What do you think? I am also puzzled that more attention is not paid to the Hollister appeal.


38 posted on 10/02/2009 8:49:28 AM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Oh my, she cited Vattel right off the bat. I can’t wait to read the judge’s ruling next week.


39 posted on 10/02/2009 10:36:28 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: YoungGunConservativeRadio

40 posted on 10/02/2009 10:37:15 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: Soap, ballot, jury, & ammo. Use in that order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson