Skip to comments.Citing UIPA, I requested ALL Obama's Vital Records And you may LIKE the rule(s) I cited.
Posted on 07/31/2009 7:59:53 PM PDT by MissTickly
click here to read article
Me or Obama?
Do you like it? Do you really, really like it?
I didn’t see this! You’re welcome, my sister! I am not a lawyer so I hope it was CLEAR to you why I cited what I cited.
And what’s wonderful is that I cited it FOR HIS HEALTH AND SAFETY.
Racist? No WAY! I live a integregated life!!!
Fine. Name them. Every one of them. State the criteria you use to qualify them as racist. And, document the data you've developed. Otherwise STFU
You realize this could be a very ironic thing for the race-baiters on the left, eh?
I’ve requested the protocol for if they reject or don’t respond at all. I re-file with the Office Of Information and the Lt. Gov. oversees that agency. So, I copied them on my UPIA Request.
I suspect they won’t respond because they WANT to LET the Office of Information rule on this one. But, citing TWO rules, beautifully I must say—I think I have a very good case.
There were NO exceptions to these rules.
Birth records WERE exceptions to OTHER rules, but NOT these two.
I will be following this request through to the end.
Can they stall four to eight years? It will be interesting to see.
Nope, they have five days to fulfill once they acknowledge receipt. If they ignore it or reject it, in ten days I re-file with the Office of Information.
On ruling on my UIPA request:
An agency must balance the significant privacy interest against the public interest in disclosure of the information. If the public interest is found to outweigh the individual privacy interest, the agency must disclose the information. Where an agency cannot identify a significant privacy interest, the slightest public interest in disclosure will require the agency to disclose the record.
I would say protecting the safety of the president presents SIGNIFICANT public interest.
I have since added this statement and asked that it be consider in deliberation. And I truly stand by it:
I ask that you consider this Per Request #1 (Part 15):
There is NO dispute, in my mind, that protecting the safety & health of our President presents THE UTMOST SIGNIFICANT public interest for not only for him, myself, EVERY AMERICAN and his family but, frankly, the world. And although I am aware of the reasons to protect privacy, none are more significant than President’s Obama’s safety and health. Whether you agree while deliberating your ruling or not, I wanted to add that to the record.
An agency must balance the significant privacy interest against
the public interest in disclosure of the information. If the public
interest is found to outweigh the individual privacy interest,
the agency must disclose the information. Where an agency
cannot identify a significant privacy interest, the slightest
public interest in disclosure will require the agency to disclose
If you require further support for my UIPA request, per “Agency Records that Must Be Disclosed”-Part (15), please let me know. Unfortunately, I have come across a lot of expert opinion in the press, especially in the last few weeks, to support the case that, for the President’s Safety and therefore the public’s safety, there is SIGNIFICANT public interest in fulfilling my UIPA records and information request.
Please do not let this madness grow. And experts are in agreement, it’s growing. I can provide more support, please ask me if you’d like me to provide it.
I ask that you operate openly, in the interest of the public and President Barack Obama.
Please file this statement, too, along with my UIPA request.
Just a short time ago my router went down. I find it VERY curious and wanted to post that here. I am pretty saavy with computers, and I noticed a network called “Fightclub” I have never seen before when I searched for my network.
I am ethernet connected at the moment.
If I don’t report back everyday for the next 2 weeks, please alert the proper authorities.
Just for the record!
ain’t gonna’ happen Miss Tickles,sorry
The plain reading of this EO covers the decisions to invoke Executive Privilege (release of records) of "former and incumbent" office holders. Why are you assuming it does NOT cover Barry today? Doesn't "incumbent" in this EO mean CURRENT Presidents and Vice Presidents?
It’s dealing with Presidential records not personal records. There is a difference (big difference). This is for records created while serving as President. So like if Clinton had an email that said do NOT try to catch OBL and he didn’t want that out...he could try to exert executive privilege. Or for the guy currently in the office...it details how they are to handle his claims of executive privilege. So if he has emails where he knows Iran was ablet to be toppled and he said do nothing...he could hide that info for a while. It has nothing to do with his BC as that’s a personal record.
FYI, I had Leo Donofrio look at it and asked for his legal opinion.
“You have made your case well.”
Were you there for a good argument?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.