Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Citing UIPA, I requested ALL Obama's Vital Records And you may LIKE the rule(s) I cited.
7/31/2009 | Vanity

Posted on 07/31/2009 7:59:53 PM PDT by MissTickly

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: stboz

Me or Obama?

Do you like it? Do you really, really like it?


21 posted on 07/31/2009 8:58:46 PM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

I didn’t see this! You’re welcome, my sister! I am not a lawyer so I hope it was CLEAR to you why I cited what I cited.

And what’s wonderful is that I cited it FOR HIS HEALTH AND SAFETY.

Racist? No WAY! I live a integregated life!!!


22 posted on 07/31/2009 9:03:39 PM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly
"According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, there were 926 racist groups in the United States"

Fine. Name them. Every one of them. State the criteria you use to qualify them as racist. And, document the data you've developed. Otherwise STFU

23 posted on 07/31/2009 9:20:54 PM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS

You realize this could be a very ironic thing for the race-baiters on the left, eh?


24 posted on 07/31/2009 9:29:42 PM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly

BTT


25 posted on 07/31/2009 9:31:55 PM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly
I understand that racist groups and bigots exist. I understand that race-baiters of all stripes exist. I understand race hustlers exist. The SPLC uses the racist charge like a sawed-off shotgun to clear the (rhetorical) room. They’re just another collection of race hustling propagandists.
26 posted on 07/31/2009 9:52:23 PM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS

Yup.


27 posted on 07/31/2009 9:53:52 PM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS

I’ve requested the protocol for if they reject or don’t respond at all. I re-file with the Office Of Information and the Lt. Gov. oversees that agency. So, I copied them on my UPIA Request.

I suspect they won’t respond because they WANT to LET the Office of Information rule on this one. But, citing TWO rules, beautifully I must say—I think I have a very good case.

There were NO exceptions to these rules.

Birth records WERE exceptions to OTHER rules, but NOT these two.

I will be following this request through to the end.


28 posted on 07/31/2009 9:54:46 PM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly

BTTT


29 posted on 07/31/2009 10:07:34 PM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly

Can they stall four to eight years? It will be interesting to see.


30 posted on 07/31/2009 10:21:33 PM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS

Nope, they have five days to fulfill once they acknowledge receipt. If they ignore it or reject it, in ten days I re-file with the Office of Information.


31 posted on 07/31/2009 10:24:25 PM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly

On ruling on my UIPA request:

“An agency must balance the significant privacy interest against the public interest in disclosure of the information. If the public interest is found to outweigh the individual privacy interest, the agency must disclose the information. Where an agency cannot identify a significant privacy interest, the slightest public interest in disclosure will require the agency to disclose the record.”

I would say protecting the safety of the president presents SIGNIFICANT public interest.


32 posted on 07/31/2009 11:09:36 PM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly

I have since added this statement and asked that it be consider in deliberation. And I truly stand by it:

Dr. Fukino-

I ask that you consider this Per Request #1 (Part 15):

There is NO dispute, in my mind, that protecting the safety & health of our President presents THE UTMOST SIGNIFICANT public interest for not only for him, myself, EVERY AMERICAN and his family but, frankly, the world. And although I am aware of the reasons to protect privacy, none are more significant than President’s Obama’s safety and health. Whether you agree while deliberating your ruling or not, I wanted to add that to the record.

On Ruling-UIPA:
“An agency must balance the significant privacy interest against
the public interest in disclosure of the information. If the public
interest is found to outweigh the individual privacy interest,
the agency must disclose the information. Where an agency
cannot identify a significant privacy interest, the slightest
public interest in disclosure will require the agency to disclose
the record.”

If you require further support for my UIPA request, per “Agency Records that Must Be Disclosed”-Part (15), please let me know. Unfortunately, I have come across a lot of expert opinion in the press, especially in the last few weeks, to support the case that, for the President’s Safety and therefore the public’s safety, there is SIGNIFICANT public interest in fulfilling my UIPA records and information request.

Please do not let this madness grow. And experts are in agreement, it’s growing. I can provide more support, please ask me if you’d like me to provide it.

I ask that you operate openly, in the interest of the public and President Barack Obama.

Please file this statement, too, along with my UIPA request.


33 posted on 08/01/2009 12:39:29 AM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly

Just a short time ago my router went down. I find it VERY curious and wanted to post that here. I am pretty saavy with computers, and I noticed a network called “Fightclub” I have never seen before when I searched for my network.

I am ethernet connected at the moment.

If I don’t report back everyday for the next 2 weeks, please alert the proper authorities.

Just for the record!


34 posted on 08/01/2009 1:22:08 AM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly

ain’t gonna’ happen Miss Tickles,sorry


35 posted on 08/01/2009 1:23:05 AM PDT by MissDairyGoodnessVT ("Economy is the method by which we prepare today to afford the improvements of tomorrow"C.Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
I disagree (I wish it were true) but it’s not. It would help if you removed that post and in the future put in your opinion on those types of posts, because the EO (while convoluted) does just talk about Executive Privilege and how to handle documents of former presidents.

The plain reading of this EO covers the decisions to invoke Executive Privilege (release of records) of "former and incumbent" office holders. Why are you assuming it does NOT cover Barry today? Doesn't "incumbent" in this EO mean CURRENT Presidents and Vice Presidents?

36 posted on 08/01/2009 7:03:06 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

BTTT


37 posted on 08/01/2009 7:53:30 AM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

It’s dealing with Presidential records not personal records. There is a difference (big difference). This is for records created while serving as President. So like if Clinton had an email that said do NOT try to catch OBL and he didn’t want that out...he could try to exert executive privilege. Or for the guy currently in the office...it details how they are to handle his claims of executive privilege. So if he has emails where he knows Iran was ablet to be toppled and he said do nothing...he could hide that info for a while. It has nothing to do with his BC as that’s a personal record.


38 posted on 08/01/2009 8:30:30 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MissDairyGoodnessVT

FYI, I had Leo Donofrio look at it and asked for his legal opinion.

His answer:
“You have made your case well.”


39 posted on 08/01/2009 8:32:43 AM PDT by MissTickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MissTickly

Were you there for a good argument?


40 posted on 08/01/2009 9:08:22 AM PDT by MissDairyGoodnessVT ("Economy is the method by which we prepare today to afford the improvements of tomorrow"C.Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson