I’ll try. But please read what I wrote again, too.
How Hawaii statute affects the handling of an Original Birth is no different than how they handle an Amended one.
If they have the authority to tell me Obama’s original BC is on file in accordance to law, they can say the same/or not about an Amended one. No one has to prove one exists—they have the “statutory authority” to say so.
Adoptees are treated just the same as someone who was not adopted in terms of vital record statute.
If Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, they have that information AND the authority to tell us an AMENDED certificate is on file in accordance to the law.
Does that help at all?
Okay, so you asked if they have an “amended” BC? And she said yes?
Ahhh! So you’re saying his BC is one that states Lolo is his father (adoptive). And this demonstrates loss of citizenship? Is that it?