Miss Tickly, in a sentence or two, would you please summarize what you are saying this proves? You lost me.
Hawaii said Oboma was born. They have an adoption certificate that says he was really, really born. They made it from the original that also said he was born. That's why he's here today.
Now you know. Obomas mother really did give birth. The problem is they refused to say where.
I think she’s trying to say, that maybe, just maybe the little people in Hawaii who are guarding the BC, may know something, and will tell us, if we ask it in the right way.
This whole thing, I’ve watched for over one year now. I along with a few others here started this when we independently saw that two hospitals were listed as a place of birth... etc etc.
The man has an army of attorneys keeping us from seeing his education and birth records. No other president in my life time would act this way. All presidents of this country from either party have been totally transparent and proud of thier past.
I’m a birther and proud of it.
I’ll try. But please read what I wrote again, too.
How Hawaii statute affects the handling of an Original Birth is no different than how they handle an Amended one.
If they have the authority to tell me Obama’s original BC is on file in accordance to law, they can say the same/or not about an Amended one. No one has to prove one exists—they have the “statutory authority” to say so.
Adoptees are treated just the same as someone who was not adopted in terms of vital record statute.
If Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, they have that information AND the authority to tell us an AMENDED certificate is on file in accordance to the law.
Does that help at all?