Skip to comments.DOJ Says Atty. Gen. Used Alias to Conduct Official Business to Protect Security, Privacy
Posted on 02/27/2018 10:29:51 PM PST by bitt
Illustrating how government hides information from the American public, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch used a fake name to conduct official Department of Justice (DOJ) business in agency emails obtained by Judicial Watch. As the nations chief law enforcement officer Lynch, Barack Obamas second attorney general, skirted public-records laws by using the alias Elizabeth Carlisle in emails she sent from her official DOJ account. In the records provided to Judicial Watch, the DOJ explains it as necessary to protect her security and privacy and enable her to conduct Department business efficiently via email.
This begs the question of how many other government officials use fake names and whether those aliases are searched when agencies process Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Besides Lynch, we have only discovered the use of such aliases among government operatives to conduct official business at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Obamas EPA administrator, Lisa Jackson, famously used the alias Richard Windsor in a government email account to conduct official business and communicate with staff. Jackson even took required EPA computer training under the fake identity with the handle Windsor.Richard@epa.gov. She eventually resigned over the scandal, which brought to light the agencys violations of federal open-records laws.
In Lynchs case, Judicial Watch requested the records as part of an investigation into the Obama administrations involvement in a United Nations international law enforcement coalition called Strong Cities Network (SCN). The purported mission of the global coalition was to build social cohesion and community resilience to counter violent extremism. The DOJ masterminded the agreement and Americans found out about the U.S.s participation when Lynch announced it during a U.N. speech on September 29, 2015. ...
(Excerpt) Read more at judicialwatch.org ...
There is seemingly no bottom to this corruption!
I like the names they chose. Sound like soap opera characters.
“This begs the question of how many other government officials use fake names and whether those aliases are searched when agencies process Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.”
They all did.
“In the records provided to Judicial Watch, the DOJ explains it as necessary to protect her security and privacy and enable her to conduct Department business efficiently via email.”
Despite it being illegal as hell. But I’m sure sleepy Sessions is going to set this right soon. It’s some kind of 3D chess thing....
All this lying and hiding is "normal" for them.
For those who follow Q Anon posts, Q asserts that Lorreta Lynch; HRC; James Comey, John Clapper, Chuck Shumer, Rod Rosenstein, Valerie Jarret, Susan Rice, Huma Abedin, John Biden,and Andrew McCabe had email addresses no one knew about.
A good thread on what Obama, and Lynch and Carlin were up to:
I have no problem with officials using alias emails as long as when record searches are conducted they include all aliases.
It would be hard to manage a mailbox if you used your real name as a public official because I am sure everyone emails email@example.com and it really could keep important emails from being seen.
Like I said, all searches under FOIA should be required to use these emails as part of the search.
Richard Windsor was created to communicate and hide actions. Windsor was the first one to be uncovered. DemocRATS have used this method ever since. There are no rules and regulations for them. The end ALWAYS justifies the means. To their twisted way of thinking if the end result is what they desire, all actions involved in the effort are retroactively good, legal.
It is not Department business, it is the People’s business.
Remember us, We The People!
Should have used Elephant Thighs instead.
The last post in that thread mentions EmergeUSA, which is one of the terrorist-linked groups in Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel’s network.
The EPA did it. Obama did it. Hillary did it.
All of it was an effort to subvert and ignore public records’ act and FOIA requests.
Isn’t that called fraud, and falsification of government records?
A fake email? Heck, Soebarka's fake background was exposed and most people didn't even give a damn, especially those in a position of power to actually do something about it.
Should a different outcome be expected this time?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.