Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Richard Axtell
Stunning. I am absolutely stunned by this article.

Why the hell aren't the major networks talking about this or sending in reporters????? Am I missing something? hawk

66 posted on 04/09/2003 1:24:25 PM PDT by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: hawkaw
Why the hell aren't the major networks talking about this or sending in reporters?????

What on earth makes you believe that the major networks want this information to see the light of day?

91 posted on 04/09/2003 2:27:30 PM PDT by dirtboy (United States 2, Terror-sponsoring nations 0, waiting to see who's next in the bracket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: hawkaw
Why the hell aren't the major networks talking about this or sending in reporters?????

They need something for tomorrow's news.

120 posted on 04/09/2003 4:43:10 PM PDT by NautiNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: hawkaw
Probably because of a lack of verification, which if the radiological readings mentioned here are correct, is not surprising right now.

The fun part about this, to me, is that if this pans out, it will be impossible for anyone to plausibly say that we 'planted' the evidence.

You can't 'plant' a building underground in an area with such a high water table. How long the building was there will be easily discovered.

141 posted on 04/09/2003 5:20:17 PM PDT by William McKinley (You're so vain, you probably think this tagline's about you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson