Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRANIAN REGIME WORRIED BY PEOPLE’S PRO-AMERICANISM
Iran Press Service ^ | 4.25.2003 | Afsane Bassir Pour

Posted on 04/26/2003 12:52:02 AM PDT by DoctorZIn

PARIS, 25 Apr. (IPS) As President George W. Bush has also warned the Islamic republic to stop meddling in Iraqi affairs, an influential French daily says Iranian officials are worried by the "obvious pro-Americanism sentiments" of " the Iranian people".

Iranian officials are worried. Worried of the American presence next to their doors, on the East as well as to the West, worried of the invasion of Iraq "with so little popular resistance", worried of the fast fall of the Baghdad regime, worried of the sidelining of the UN, worried of the total disillusion of the Iranian people that, since the beginning of the Iraqi crisis, has resulted in a fierce pro-Americanism of the population... but, especially, worried of the vox populi, that asks for "a change of the regime with the help of the American marines", the daily "Le Monde" wrote.

This demand is taken enough seriously in the political circles so that the resumption of the relations with America –a 24 years-old taboo – had moved forward on the political agenda in Tehran. These relations had been broken on the eve of the establishment of the Islamic Republic and the hostage taking of 55 American diplomats in 1979.

It was Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the Iranian ex-president and key man of the regime, who broke the taboo. In a long interview to an Iranian weekly, published on Saturday 21 April, Mr. Rafsanjani proposed the organisation of a referendum about the resumption of the relations with America. According to the "Rahbord" (Strategy) weekly, Mr. Rafsanjani suggested that "the crisis" between Iran and America could be solved by "a referendum in order to know what the Iranian society think about the issue, on conditions, he added, that the Majles (Parliament) and the supreme Guide, approves, a process which is routine.

The reactions didn't linger. The following day, the conservative daily "Keyhan" accused the ex-president of having crossed "the red line." A line that had sent to prison the directors of a polling institute that have shown that the Iranians are massively in favour of resumption of relations with the United States.

Rejecting as "unrealistic" the idea of a referendum on the relations with America, the reformers propose that the question be instead "immediately" examined by the leaders of the regime". For Behzad Nabavi, one of the "credible voices" of the reformers, the relations with Washington has become a "national security issue".

In a rare interview, Mr. Nabavi, a close adviser to President Khatami, told "Le Monde" that the American strategy for the region "doesn't stop to the doors of Baghdad". According to Mr. Nabavi, it exists in Washington, "an Iran project" that is in the process of being implemented", a project that is "not necessarily a military one." In his office situated at the old Marble Palace, in the south of Tehran, that also includes the Majles, of which he assures the vice-presidency, Mr. Nabavi speaks of his concern facing the Americans.

"Evidently, I am afraid!" he exclaims. "How would I not be afraid of an America armed to the teeth and who demonstrated in Iraq its total disdain of respect for the sovereignty of the States? Yes, I am afraid. The Americans are apparently able do whatever they like; no matter the United Nations or even the Western public opinion". "The only and somewhat acceptable argument to the eyes of the western intellectuals justifying a hostile action against a country is the instauration of democracy", Mr. Nabavi said. It is for it, according to him, "that the best defense of Iran against the Americans would be to reinforce its democracy in order to deprive them of their arguments".

Interrogated on the voices calling for "the American interference", Mr. Nabavi declares: "It is obvious that it is the result of our mistake. The fact that people prefer a foreign invasion to living in the Islamic Republic is only the sign of our failure. We have not been able to fulfill the people's democratic aspirations and it is normal that they are disappointed". If one admits that the Iraqis are delighted with Saddam Hoseyn's end, one must also think about the possibility that maybe, the Iranians would celebrate at the end of the Islamic Republic as well".

If the reformers have been weakened a lot by the decision of the Bush Administration to put Iran on the list of "Evil Axis" countries, many think that the "fear of America" can be a "window of opportunity facing the regime’s hard liners that prevents the democratic process". "The hard lines are afraid", said a member of the reformer’s camp. "They are ready to make some concessions; they know that we have a lot more credibility than they have", he added.

But for an Iranian architect who asks for anonymity, "there isn’t any difference between reformers and the conservatives anymore". Exacerbated by the "regime’s deep corruption", he wants its end. "It is simple. We don't want the Islamic Republic anymore", he says. "It took us a quarter of century to realise that the revolution has ended in failure". Like many other Iranians, he also calls for "the American help for change the regime". The argument meets a large echo. "The Afghans and the Iraqis have been freed from dictatorships, why not us?" said a filmmaker. Where it happens to the street man to talk about the arrival of the Marines, the intellectuals don't foresee a military interference, but "a political interference" instead.

Same sense of "fed up" among the students. The student’s movement withdrew from reformer’s organisations. One of its members, speaking under the cover of anonymity, warns the Americans "not shaking the hand of the régime". The regime doesn't want to speak of the resumption of relations because it is afraid of the Americans. "Anti-Americanism is the business of the régime", add this student.

The Chairman of the Majles’ Foreign Affairs Committee, Mohsen Mirdamadi, doesn't believe in the American military threats. "A democratic process has been engaged in Iran", he says. "A process, sustained maybe more by the world public opinion that by the opinion in Iran, but that will prevent any American military interference in our country and this will be our best defense against America".

But, on the other hand, what worries him is the "obvious disappointment" of the Iranians facing the reformers. The non-participation of the Iranians at the February elections -- in Tehran, only 12% of the voters voted - has been lived by many, in Tehran, as" the end of the grace period of the reformers". ENDS IRANIANS PRO-AMERICANISM 25403

Editor’s note: Le Monde published this article on its 25 April issue.

Editing and highlights are by IPS


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: collateralbenefits; iran; iranreform; iraq; july9; next; proamericanism; rafsanjani; southasia; southasialist
According to the Iranian Press Service, the French newspaper La Monde (France's "NY Times") can see what most of the US Press cannot, that the Iranian people are starting to ask the US to do for them what the US has done for Iraq.

This is also another reason why we don't need to be quite so worried about an Iraqi Islamic Revolution. Iraqi Shiites either have heard or soon will the cries of their Iranian "brothers" for the same freedom they now enjoy.

1 posted on 04/26/2003 12:52:02 AM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
The sight of the crowd this week was assumed to be all about an Islamic government .I do think the clerics have influence in this vacuum.I don't see this as the end of hope for a secular republic(one in which individual rights are respected).We can't throw in the towel emotionally so soon.There will be many troublemakers along the way and the Iraqis need time to grasp the value of freedom.The concept of tolerance will be tough.
2 posted on 04/26/2003 1:05:49 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Bush Memo to Iran:

Become a secular democracy or get out of Dodge.

3 posted on 04/26/2003 1:10:11 AM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
It is lovely to see the program working.

Last December it came to me in a flash what was going to happen. This will be the result of statecraft of the very highest order. Amazing wisdom.

4 posted on 04/26/2003 1:38:46 AM PDT by Iris7 (Sufficient for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
"Evidently, I am afraid!" he exclaims. Good!

Interrogated on the voices calling for "the American interference", Mr. Nabavi declares: "It is obvious that it is the result of our mistake. The fact that people prefer a foreign invasion to living in the Islamic Republic is only the sign of our failure.

I think they "get" it. You know, this is eerily like the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe. That sentence could have been said by Gorbachev.

5 posted on 04/26/2003 1:44:39 AM PDT by alnitak ("That kid's about as sharp as a pound of wet liver" - Foghorn Leghorn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
hopefully, the domino's are starting to fall into place.

Let's keep pushing !!!!!
6 posted on 04/26/2003 1:45:13 AM PDT by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Bump.
7 posted on 04/26/2003 1:54:28 AM PDT by k2blader ("Go not to the elves for counsel, for they will say both yes and no." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alnitak
Yes, " they " get it; unlike the Dems here. This is what this war was also very much about. :-)
8 posted on 04/26/2003 1:55:21 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288; lawgirl; mtngrl@vrwc; Miss Marple; kayak; SevenofNine; Wphile; azGOPgal; hoosierpearl; ...
Ping.
9 posted on 04/26/2003 1:55:58 AM PDT by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
The sight of the crowd this week was assumed to be all about an Islamic government .I do think the clerics have influence in this vacuum.

The crowd was about 3,000 in a group of over 1,000,000. The clerics tried to make the pilgrimage into an anti-American protest and failed. There are several posts on this, all from foreign press, marveling at the failure of the clerics - who had trucks with loudspeakers trying to incite the crowd.

Which is why you hear a lot more conciliation form the clerics. The majority of Iraqis want us rather than them. They know what they can lose.

10 posted on 04/26/2003 4:08:46 AM PDT by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
"Evidently, I am afraid!" he exclaims. "How would I not be afraid of an America armed to the teeth.... Yes, I am afraid.

Ahh... Music to my ears. Yes, enemies of the USA and her people... it's time to be VERY AFRAID! Consider your ways evil doers...

11 posted on 04/26/2003 4:27:34 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
Good morning, thanks for the ping
12 posted on 04/26/2003 6:06:45 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Iris7
This will be the result of statecraft of the very highest order. Amazing wisdom.

Not bad for a Yalie with a MBA. And give Krauthammer some credit as well, who predicted an Eastern Europe domino scenario for the Islamo-fascist regimes.

The War on Terrorism requires the re-order of pan-arabic governance [and Persian governance]. This is the natural order of this strategy.

13 posted on 04/26/2003 6:12:32 AM PDT by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: *southasia_list
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
14 posted on 04/26/2003 8:19:11 AM PDT by Free the USA (Stooge for the Rich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
The mullahs can't be everywhere ---while they're busy meddling in Iraq, the people back home could overthrow them. It's funny the mullahs think they can gain control over a less Shiite country at the same time their hold on a more Shiite country is slipping.
15 posted on 04/26/2003 8:32:47 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
Well not suprise it a fact that young people who are living now wasn't around during 1979 Islamic revolution they like NBA games, their Pop music

Hey it known fact that Michael Jordan is very popular players among Muslum teens
16 posted on 04/26/2003 11:01:08 AM PDT by SevenofNine (Not everybody in it for truth, justice, and the American way=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Dashole is deeply saddened by all of this and Geraldine Farraro thinks the Iraqi people were better off under that loving compassionate leader Sadam. Maybe she should here from an Iraqui scheduled for execution??

Pray for GW and Our Troops

17 posted on 04/26/2003 11:08:17 AM PDT by bray (Old Glory Means Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
Thanks for the ping to a very interesting and encouraging article.
18 posted on 04/26/2003 11:18:43 AM PDT by patricia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater
Establish a consumer society and a meritocracy and the Islamists are done for.
19 posted on 04/26/2003 10:19:55 PM PDT by Iris7 (Sufficient for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson