Your quote is irrelevant.
I was speaking to Wilson's public use of his wife's maiden (and professional)name.
posted on 10/01/2003 9:09:34 AM PDT
(Two Wrongs don't make a right- they make the Democratic Ticket for 2004!)
It is irrelevant to the blind. She was "covered." We don't know what her cover was - only that she was buried in another agency. What if "Valerie Plame" was presented as, say, a USAID official? Then some newspaper, based upon a White House source, identifies her as CIA? If you don't see how that is an issue, then you are willfully ignoring the facts. So what if he used her name, if she is being presented as something other than CIA?
posted on 10/01/2003 9:12:27 AM PDT
(And I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson