Skip to comments.
Smoking out the real Rush [Mulshine]
Newark Star Ledger ^
| 10/12/03
| Paul Mulshine
Posted on 10/12/2003 10:25:11 AM PDT by Incorrigible
Edited on 07/06/2004 6:39:13 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The other day I wrote a column pointing out that Rush Limbaugh, while amusing and often insightful, is not a conservative. He is simply an entertainer who uses conservatism to sell a wide range of products.
I got a large number of calls and e-mails from dimwitted dittoheads. My favorite informed me that as a conservative I should brush up on the work of a certain "Bill Krystal." I replied that I had no idea who he was talking about. The dittohead merely informed me that every conservative knows who Bill Krystal is.
(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: billkrystal; eib; limbaugh; maharushie; mikesawyer; rush; rushlimbaou; rushlimbaugh; rushlimbo; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Paul Mulshine has gotten even crankier in the years since he moved to the Star Ledger from Philadelphia. He has libertarian leanings and would like to ban SUVs but many times he hits the nail square on the head.
To: All
Free Republic. More Bang For The Buck!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
10/12/2003 10:27:17 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: Incorrigible
I've yet to meet a person with "Libertarian leanings" who wants to ban SUVs. I don't know this writer or the "Mike" fellow he talks about, but there are legions of people out there who have come to know Rush. Based on what I've read from the column, I conclude that the writer is a jerk.
4
posted on
10/12/2003 10:30:27 AM PDT
by
dr_who_2
To: Incorrigible
"He is simply an entertainer who uses conservatism to sell a wide range of products." I think it more accurate to describe Limbaugh as a conservative who sells a wide range of products in order to get his message accross. And get rich, of course.
However, I concur with the author in condemning Rush's generally favorable treatment of tobacco use.
5
posted on
10/12/2003 10:31:06 AM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: Sam Cree
Don't want to pick on Rush now---I hope his treatment works and feel like losing his hearing is enough punishment, but the writer hit the nail on the head in calling Rush an entertainer---I'm quite certain that if someone paid him $300 million to host a wildly liberal talk show, he would.
To: dr_who_2
MEGA DITTOS TO THAT!!!!!!!
To: Incorrigible
He has libertarian leanings and would like to ban SUVs Is his picture in the dictionary next to "conflicted?"
8
posted on
10/12/2003 10:39:29 AM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
To: Founding Father
"I'm quite certain that if someone paid him $300 million to host a wildly liberal talk show, he would." I might do it myself, not that anyone would ask me too, since I'm not qualified. But, actually, I consider Rush to be a man of strong convictions, fighting for the cause in which he believes.
BTW, re your screen name, which founding father do you admire the most?
9
posted on
10/12/2003 10:43:13 AM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: Incorrigible
Just a question, not a challenge. How is banning SUVs compatible with libertarian leanings?
10
posted on
10/12/2003 10:43:49 AM PDT
by
jammer
To: jammer
Just a question, not a challenge. How is banning SUVs compatible with libertarian leanings?It's not. But that's Paul for you. He would prefer we all be zipping around in sports cars.
(So would I but I've grown used to my minivan!)
To: Incorrigible
Paul Mulshine ?
Now I've heard of him!
12
posted on
10/12/2003 10:48:34 AM PDT
by
lonestar
(Don't mess with Teexas)
To: Incorrigible
"It was at that moment that I realized that this clown had somehow fused in his head the identity of Billy Crystal, the comedian, and William Kristol, the writer, to create this new personality, Bill Krystal."
I wonder if this jackass realizes that Bill is short for William, and that "Kristol" and "Krystal" are pronounced is pretty much the same way. But, rather than consider that they guy just didn't know how to spell his last name, he comes up with this garbage.
Quite frankly, I wouldn't be questioning other people's conservatism if I was this guy.
13
posted on
10/12/2003 10:50:42 AM PDT
by
Sofa King
(-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS! http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/)
To: Incorrigible
The writer is an elistist who claims that because someone misspelled Kristol's (I may have just misspelled it too) name that he doesn't know the difference between the comedian and the conservative pundit with similar names.
He's obviously jealous of Rush's success.
I do agree with him about Rush's irrational attitude towards anyone with an anti-smoking attitude. There are some valid complaints, but cigarettes do cause cancer and anyone who works to persuade children from starting to smoke is one of the good guys.
14
posted on
10/12/2003 10:53:41 AM PDT
by
alnick
(Pray that God will grant wisdom to American voters.)
To: Incorrigible
"...That's right, the antismoking hysteria has now reached a point where Little League teams are wearing uniforms with the team name Smoking Kills." I didn't hear Rush say that, but assuming he did, Rush really blew it there. It's one thing to make fun of lawyers and politicians who try to enrich themselves by claiming that their tobacco-using clients had no idea that smoking was hazardous to their health, but to make fun of a guy who organizes a little league team and urges kids not to smoke cigarettes is insane. This guy Sawyer wasn't blaming the cigarette industry for his father's death, he was simply urging youngsters not to smoke.
Though Limbaugh has endorsed the drug war, he seems to have a soft spot for certain drugs. He has admitted to abusing prescription sedatives and is going into rehab. That's nice, but in the past he consigned his fellow drug abusers not to rehab but to prison.
Summarizing Rush's hypocritcal approach to the drug issue: "Tobacco and `prescription pain medication' good -- less harmful drugs that I don't use bad."
15
posted on
10/12/2003 11:00:43 AM PDT
by
ravinson
To: Sofa King
My email to the Star Ledger .. had to email it to the head of the Opinion department .. this weasel has no email address published that I could find:
Does Mr. Mulshine have an email address? If so, I cannot find it posted on your site. If he does not, you can pass this along to him:
Mr. Mulshine,
What a pathetic thing for you to do. Everyone can get their jabs in for someone who confessed to abusing prescription painkillers for chronic pain. You're commentary is nothing out of the ordinary ... more pack mentality. Your snide, derisive cynical comments are more indicative of your character than exhibiting any journalistic cleverness.
I could almost see the drool seeping out of the corners of your grinning mouth.
Millions of people suffer from chronic pain. I have family members who are hostage to pain meds for their very daily mobility. Funny how you pack followers don't do feature stories on regular pain sufferers who risk much to keep going and aren't the #1 radio talk show host in America, or have a conservative audience and wide influence. That might be a beneficial exercise.
Humility comes to all of us, sooner or later. I pray your comeuppance isn't paintfully devastating. I wouldn't be too cocky, if I were you .. karma has a way of playing "gotcha." That's just life. In the meantime, pile on.
Every friend I have in NJ will now know about you, and I'll encourage them to stop reading your newspaper.
16
posted on
10/12/2003 11:22:40 AM PDT
by
STARWISE
To: Incorrigible
This article is so stupid that I refuse to answer it except to say that those who agree or are piling on aren't worthy of shining Rush's shoes!
To: Incorrigible
This article is so stupid that I refuse to answer it except to say that those who agree or are piling on aren't worthy of shining Rush's shoes!
To: eno_
Is his picture in the dictionary next to "conflicted?" Maybe, he seems to favor that wimpie, Tom dASShole too.
19
posted on
10/12/2003 11:33:15 AM PDT
by
BobbyK
To: Incorrigible
The last time I listened to Rush he was a NAFTA loving, job-exporting, bomb-the-world, tax-cuts for me, Neo-con. I hope he recovers both physically and mentally.
Gads do you remember that facade he put up about his ear operation to restore his hearing. I actually believed him then, no more. Throw in suckups to Ginrich and Bennett. What a fakeroo.
20
posted on
10/12/2003 12:13:32 PM PDT
by
ex-snook
(Americans needs PROTECTIONISM - military and economic.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson