The insurance issue is compelling. To summarise the article:
* MGM are out a billion dollars if this was terrorism.
* Conceivably MGM have reason to fear liability (e.g. they allowed unfettered use of the freight elevator).
* Trump agrees to preserve that story, but forces regime change in Saudi.
* Also the article throws reasonable doubt on the identity of the shooter. Conceivably he was a highroller who had access, and ISIS piggybacked on that.
There’s a lot to think about here. Can any of this be proved/disproved?